they are often portrayed as weak and vulnerable. This we didn't conform to. Other conventions were aimed at creating the right atmosphere. Footage was taken with a dark mise en scene limiting what you could see. This lets the audience’s imagination wondering at what is there. This is another luring affect of suspense. This was a favourite technique of Alfred Hitchcock who favoured suspenseover surprise. The other variation is to show the audience what the characters cannot see and then toy with the audience as to what will happen next. These conventions puts the thriller in the mystery and psychological sub-genre. There were no films that influenced us as a group. We did our own research and brought thoughts from films to the table. One that influenced me was Double Jeopardy. Specifically, that it was as much psychological as mystery really enthralled me. Another series fuelled my inspiration was CSI.
The way they have flashbacks to the crime or a related scenario: The jumping images, grainy images, colour changes and focus changes inspired my contribution to our flashback sequence.

The social group that is represented by our media product is not of a very large spectrum in terms of race and class. All the characters are working and middle working class people of a British white background but there was a reasonable distribution of both sexes. The main character was defined as a quiet individual and through this unique attitude, draws your attention. The age has a much broader potential range. The main and her friends are young, in their late teens. The antagonist at the end
is also an unknown quantity as the main character does not know them. However they are also an unknown quantity to the audience as they do not know any more than the girl.Our representation of women does follow the stereotype but would develop away from it. At first the women are far more responsible and as the scene shifts from the group to the individual girl she is defined to as the quiet, young and naive girl who inevitably gets into trouble. She would become stronger and independent in time.
This would draw the target audience in as the ages are similar to the target audience and because its a twist on what happens. Starting with a stereotypical background puts the audience at ease but by then throwing them it draws them in.
If this film were to be distributed and had been made to cinema quality I think it would be a film that has a period in smaller cinemas and art houses for maybe three weeks. It has all the main conventions included and challenges them enough to attract people. It is though more experimental and doesn’t follow the mainstream take on a thriller. On the grand scale of things it would be a DVD and TV film later. If the script and the copyright were sold to a Hollywood studio/company then that combined with the budgets would make it a big release.
Like many ‘pure’ thrillers this would be a single standing film. It would be difficult to make a sequel. There is though the possibility of franchise and also merchandising. Primarily, the soundtrack to the film and also the prestige of big name studios. Also, if the film is publicised enough there is always a opening for merchandise such as small paraphernalia and shirts. A film that is not designed for children is often limited in terms of merchandise. This link has only three items for this adult thriller/horror film. The visual style of the thriller does not lend itself to a variety of merchandise which is down to the darker nature of the film.
The target audience for our media production is broad. It is aimed at those that enjoy the complexities of a psychological thriller which keeps you guessing. The age range of this is large but we limited this with our cast. By using young actors and actresses we brought the age of appeal down to 15 to 35 on a large scale, focusing mainly on the 15 to 25 year olds. This was the only real limit on target audience that we deliberately made, though with little diversity in race and social backgrounds of characters, that may prove to be another audience limiting factor.
To attract our audience we made the characters a similar age to the target audience.


able for most of our filming. The camera ran on tapes and making sure the tape was in the right place before and after filming was an inconvenience. Also, when uploading we often had to re-synchronize the audio and video signals. (Indicated by red boxes)Final cut though we were quite successful with. We very quickly picked up the art of cutting sequences and rearranging them in to the correct order. This was particularly interesting when creating the killing sequence; having to cut different angle shots of the same action and piece them together as a coherent sequence. It did work very well though and the time was well spent. However making
this sequence was difficult because we had used two different cameras to produce the footage. This in turn produced about 20 minutes of raw footage from the two cameras to watch and select the best parts of.
Since the preliminary task I feel I have learnt a lot about the equipment and about final cut express. I have been able to use both to much greater effect. The hardest part was the storyboarding and deciding what sort of shots we wanted, due mostly to the length of the two pieces comparatively (15 seconds and 2 minutes) . This took us around two weeks to finish. The research was time consuming but was very useful. Knowing what sort of websites to look at and films to analyse helped.

























