Showing posts with label Henry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Henry. Show all posts

Friday, 12 March 2010

Henry's Evaluation

In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?

Our thriller conforms to
conventions of thrillers in several areas of our film. There is a generic convention with the antagonist-protagonist relationship between the two main characters, seen in many thrillers.



The use of voyeurism is a convention, the idea that something or someone is watching you. This allows the audience to ‘step in to the character’s shoes’ and understand fully the situation they are in. This can be identified in the 'entering the woods' scene with the use of the 'crab shots'. This photo shows conforming to conventions; the antagonist is seen in a hooded coat, adding to the dark, mysterious character profile that is represented.

The flash of light during the flashback sequence is archetypal. Seen in many psychological films/media (like Seven, CSI, Criminal Minds) indicating a previous event somehow linked to the character. These media products have influenced our work, clearly illustrated by our content.
However, our film does challenge conventions as our lead character is female, going against the idea that the main character is a
tough (alpha) male figure. Our conventions indicate our genre is psychological. This involves asking questions of the audience and surprising them, demonstrated at the climax of film when the antagonist appears in the window this is left at a point where the outcome is hinted, but not shown: a ‘cliff hanger ending’. A sub genre of crime could be indicated by the stabbing scene, showing violence/murder.


How does your media product represent particular social groups?


The social group that is represented in our media is white teenage males and females. This links into our target audience of both genders, between the ages of 15-35. In our film, the social group that is heavily represented is the white, middle class. I believe gender is represented very stereotypically:a vulnerable girl and a powerful man. We have represented the (assumed) male as strong and the female to be vulnerable and weak. In the ‘killing scene’ the male uses his power over a helpless female victim. However, if we could show more than the opening we would show the female lead growing in character as the film progresses.

What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?

I believe our film could be produced by a major Hollywood studio, many conventions of mainstream thrillers are shown. The topic can be widely understood by our target audience.

Our product would not be released as an art house film as the film is not heavily reliant on aspects of mise en scene. It is not very experimental either; the camera shots are fairly conventional to a thriller, for example: tracking, close-ups, and long shots.


This film would not be an internet only release; meaning limited access for consumers. Our film is appealing to a younger audience (the people who watch films regularly and buy DVDs) so it would need to be as widely accessible as possible, to maximise profit potential.

It does give opportunities for merchandising; t-shirts and posters could be sold. The merchandising would take into consideration our target audience (15-30) as university students could use posters to decorate their rooms, if they could not afford to spend money on expensive artwork.
Our film could be made into a franchise, for instance video games based on the storyline. We are now increasingly dependent on technology; so this could sell based on the target audience. The potential for DVD sales after the initial cinema release would increase revenue.

Who is the audience for our media product?

Our film targets those aged 15-30, this should not limit the appeal of the film to this age group, those older may also enjoy it.
The film would appeal to our target audience because they can relate to the situation the characters find themselves in. The age of our cast is similar to our audience; meaning they will feel more connected. This age group are generally more aware of newly released films and have more free time, making it easier to target this audience. The certification for the film is a 12A but this will not stipulate the age of the viewers.

How did you attract/address your audience?

Our audience profile consists on both genders, aged 15-30. We attracted our audience by including a violent stabbing scene. This age group would be the most accepting of this ‘horror-like’ scene, this could almost be an expectation of young audiences.


 

We made the flashback particularly terrifying because of the black and white hue; this confuses the audience slightly, as the focus is altered. This effect helps to differentiate from the rest of the film. The changes of perspective (created using 2 separate cameras) and the harsh jump cuts speed up the action, increasing the viewer’s tension. We used a point-of-view (POV) shot allowing the audience to become involved in the terrifying situation with the main character, seeing what she sees, increasing anxiety. 

The non diagetic music is crucial to attracting our audience. It is conventional, ‘chilling’ music that is almost continuous throughout. The changes in pitch of the music arrive at key moments, giving 
the audience (in some cases) an unwanted indication of what is about to happen.

We used close ups to show the panic and fear of the girl taking the audience into her mind.

We used a motivated cut to increase the viewer’s interest as she enters the caravan. We cut away at the point where the audience wishes to see something (the body) which is not quite visible.

What have you learnt about the technologies from the process of constructing this product?

To always check that the camera(s) are charged! We had problems whilst filming because we were left with no battery left. Fortunately we had two cameras available to use, so we could use one whilst the other charged.

The camera we were given limited what and how we could film. To counter this, we used one of our own cameras in tandem with the one we already had. This allowed us to 
get two perspectives of each shot, (for example a different POV angle) seen most effectively in the flashback killing scene:




During filming, the sound was difficult to control. As we had to film in the dark for most of our piece, we had to think of an alternative light source other than natural lighting.
Lighting was checked during practice filming. We used lights off a quad bike and a generator. The generator (whilst giving the right amount of light) had overridden the diagetic sound and was picked up easily by our cameras.
We had to re-film what the opening sequence. After this we filmed each sequence several times with and without the generator. We then (when editing) chose the clip that was most suitable. Re-filming was another problem; there was no guarantee that the same cast would be available again. We had to swap actresses for the re-film.



I learnt during the editing stage how to edit together effectively using the software final cut express. I learnt how to sync the film with the sound (as they came from different sources). When we exported our film, the sound was out of time with the film so I had to drag the respective bars into position; the sound then fitted with the sequence.







Since the preliminary task I have learnt the many effects available to us. One effect which is evident throughout, is the ‘cross-dissolve’, this softened the transition form shot to shot. I learnt how to change the colour of the original killing sequence to black and white.



We had a track from other sources that had copyright free use. We also had several tracks from a composer of thriller music. The main problem was getting the copyright free versions from him. but we managed to do this.

Looking back to your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to the full product?

After the preliminary task, we started research and planning. We worked well as a team, bringing different ideas to the process. We tracked our progress with ‘meetings’, which summarised what we had been doing and delegated responsibility of different tasks to each person. Storyboarding was the hardest process of planning, as it was so specific and we were bringing together all our research on to one piece of paper. This did help us when filming, as we knew what shot to film in what sequence.

Our research into current thriller films and their conventions helped, as we started to formulate an idea of what an audience expects of a thriller. We narrowed down a ‘mental check list’ of shots commonly used in thrillers and then tried to expand:

- Voyeurism (Tracking, Crabbing)
- POV shots
- Close-ups
- Long shots
- Canted Angle
- Establishing shot
- Low angle / Worms eye view
-Matched Cuts - This shows matched cuts being used to show compression of time to the audience.

The practice filming was vital. This gave us the chance to test each shot and its length based on the storyboard and work out what worked the best. Lighting was the main thing we tested, and whether people would be visible from
different angles. This was all done a week before the real filming, when the cast arrived.

I feel my filming skills have improved. I have learnt to adapt the shots to my needs and abilities after extensive work during practice filming.

Overall, I believe our team has created a very good end product that would be successful if made for real. I think it fulfils the task set and I am proud of what we have achieved.

Wednesday, 10 March 2010

Editing

We completed our editing on friday and have exported it to be burnt to disk.
We are pleased with the outcome and have now began our evaluation.

Thursday, 4 March 2010

Title Dilemma

After we decided our title needs to be changed, (in order to better fit thriller conventions) I came with an alternative title:

- (The) Unknown - this few syllables than 'Attention to detail', has links to the plot (unknown antagonist, stepping into the unknown) and leaves the audience guessing as to what this might involve.

I have also added this post to my "possible titles" post which I wrote on 01/02/10 because of its relevance.

Wednesday, 3 March 2010

Meeting 21 - 03/03/10

Everyone attended today.
We used our lesson as well as one of our study periods to get to were we are now. In the last lesson we were able to gather clips ready to insert in the main sequence which is what we did today.

Between us we arranged more of the sequence and continued to add to it, as well as discussing what we still need to include, actors names are one of the things we are yet to add. We also talked about the title and agreed that it was too long and so needed to be shortened or a new title come up with.

On the editing day (05/03/10) one of our main targets is to arrange the shots in a more accute manner, so that it holds our target audience in suspense whilst at the same time showing our technical skills with the camera.

Tomorrow we aim to FINISH THE EDITING PROCESS.

Sunday, 28 February 2010

Titles

After group discussion on friday and Grace and Jonny's discussed titles I believe:

DISAPPEARANCE would be my first choice: this title is an polysyllabic abstract noun so I believe has more of an impact on audience, there is one obvious link to the plot (the girl) and then one slightly more subtle (the antagonist).

ATTENTION TO DETAIL my second: I am less sure where this fits into the story. I see this as more generic but I would still be happy for it to be used as our title.

Thursday, 25 February 2010

Meeting 20 - 25/02/10

All Attended.
Today was simply a continuation of yesterday's work, editing through the 'Woods' sequence. This time we focused more on the non diagetic music, trying to use the music more appropriately and build it up towards the end to create tension and an air of mystery ready for the upcoming sequence. It was also discussed that we should intertwine shots of her walking through the woods with quick shots of a 'presence' in the midst of darkness to speed up the action, as it is fairly slow to start.

Wednesday, 24 February 2010

Meeting 19 - 24/02/10

All Attended.
Today we continued to edit sections of our uploaded footage. We made the opening shots shorter as we all felt it dragged on too much, believing that this would fail to capture our audience's attention. We also found how to vary the levels of sound in the film through Final Cut Express. This will be useful as we do not want our audience to become immune to parts of our film(immunisation model) because they have been exposed to the same material for so long that it has no effect on them. We added a close up of the main character early on in the sequence so that the audience can establish who she is, then we can put more focus upon her and carefully start detach her from the group around the camp fire.

We will continue to edit through this week with a view to getting at least one scene of the film fully edited by Friday (26/02/10)

Thursday, 11 February 2010

Meeting 18 - 10/02/10

Today all were in the lesson.
We uploaded the re-filmed footage and reviewed it. We all felt that it was much better than last time.
We started to put this in place of our previous filming.
The uploading took most of the lesson because we had a problem with capturing it onto the computer and we have yet to still capture some. We tried lots of different cameras as we thought it may be a problem with the camera but this made no difference, so Grace is going to try the tape in her video camera at home to see if it is a problem with the tape.

Monday, 8 February 2010

Meeting 17 (Lesson Update) - 08/02/10

Unfortunately both Jonny and Grace were unavailable because of 'drama production' commitments.
So the only thing I (Henry) felt I could do (that we hadn't already covered) was to practise more editing techniques in final cut express, as my skills in editing needed to be improved.

I will take a look at the footage shot from re-filming when we meet again on Wednesday, and again begin to edit through the appropriate shots. We may also finalise a title for our film.

Friday, 5 February 2010

Meeting 16 - 05/02/10

All Attended.
We continued to edit clips filmed, focusing on getting the sound to syncronise with the piece of film. The pieces of film we looked at was the 'Opening Credits' leading into 'Through the woods' scene with our main character.
Grace showed Henry and Jonny the video effects she had found from the previous lesson. Now they both understand what is available in 'effects' and how they can be altered.
On Friday afternoon/evening Grace and Jonny, along with our main and supporting characters, will reshoot the opening sequence because of the unfortunate sound problems encountered last weekend. Henry is unable to attend but will keep up to date with the progress made this weekend via the blog.

Thursday, 4 February 2010

Meeting 15 - 4/02/10

Today all attended.
Jonny unfortunately had to leave early but this didn't effect our work as we just continued to look at editing our film.
We (Grace and Henry) started working on another frame of our storyboard and managed to synchronise the sound with the action that was on screen as we had to take sound from one area and used it elsewhere.
Grace also played around with final cut express and looked further into making the sequence a little brighter to make the action clearer.

Wednesday, 3 February 2010

Meeting 14 - 03/02/10

All Attended.

Today we focused on continuing to edit particular pieces of our filming from last weekend. We also looked through the filmed shots that we had uploaded from last time but not viewed as a whole, to see if the camera shots, lighting and sound were at a good standard. We were happy with most of the shots we took it is mainly the sound and lighting that is causing problems. We also considered a titles for our film, Henry has already come up with a few whilst Grace and Jonny said they will do the same in coming lessons.

As discussed this week, we plan to re-film the very start of our sequence as we are now aware that by using the generator to gain extra light in certain shots, we lose alot of the natural and ambient sounds within the film. We thought about overlaying non diagetic sounds but are very aware of overusing this technique, we want the music tracks to add to the suspense and tension of the film not ditract from it. Over the couple of weeks we will continue to edit filming trying out different effects in Final Cut Express as we go.

Monday, 1 February 2010

Possible Titles

We have already posted a video on our chosen title sequence, thinking about the layout/order and several texts creating a variety of different effects. However, as yet no one has come up with a title for our opening sequence and I had a moment of inspiration today. I realise that this title decision is small in comparison to rest of the filming process, but it is something that needs to be considered.

Here are some possible titles that I came up with for our film:

- Shadow, (In the) Shadow
- Silouette
- Target
- Disturbed
- Hunted, (The) Hunted
- Dead Silent, The Deathly Silence

On 04/03/10, after we decided our title needs to be changed, (in order to better fit thriller conventions) I came with an alternative title:

- (The) Unknown - this few syllables than 'Attention to detail', has links to the plot (unknown antagonist, stepping into the unknown) and leaves the audience guessing as to what this might involve.

Sunday, 31 January 2010

Opening Title Sequence

Below is the opening title sequence that we have come up with.

Saturday, 30 January 2010

Logos

Below are the logos that we constructed for our opening sequence




Meeting 13 - 29/01/10 to 30/01/10

All attended at Grace's house.

Friday: Max Gibbens, Lewis Rendell, Rosie Hogg, Jack Banks and Abi Carsberg were able to get to Grace's and film the parts with multiple actors and the killing of the deceased victim. This was successful. We also looked over our opening sequence and came up with logos for our company.

Saturday morning: We uploaded the raw footage that we had taken on Friday evening. We began importing it into our opening sequence on final cut express, to see if it worked in the places we wanted it to go and that it was fully syncronised. One problem with our footage, was that when we used a generated light, the noise of the generator was picked up too well by the camera. This meant that it was the dominant feature in our footage instead of the noise made during the action. We have come up with a solution to this, which is to re-record the sound and then place this over the top of the old sound to cut out the generator. However, if this does not work our only other option is to re-record the whole of the footage.

Saturday afternoon/evening: Abi returned and we filmed the woods scene with her. Since our problem with the generator from Friday, we knew that we had to do something about the noise of the noise of it. We decided to record the footage with the generator on, so we had the light and then we re-recorded it without the light and when it comes to editing we will overlay the sound without the generator onto the footage.

Saturday evening: We finished filming our storyboard but until this has been fully viewed it is unknown to us whether the outcome is what we expect. We uploaded our latest footage to final cut express. We will start to view and edit this next time.

Friday, 29 January 2010

Meeting 12 - 29/01/10

Everyone attended today.
We reviewed the uploads that Grace did of the videos last time.
We all then played around with final cut express working on our opening titles and looking again at the fonts we had short listed.
We changed our production name from Drunken Duck Productions to Nightmare Productions as we felt that our Drunken Duck Productions was a bit comical for the Thriller Genre.
We continued to work on our opening titles sequence and have constructed this how we would like it to be but there are still some changes to be made later.

Practice Filming

If the videos below fail to work please go to our youtube page.

Wednesday, 27 January 2010

Meeting 11 - 27/01/10

Today all attended.
We looked at all the fonts that we had on the CD and narrowed our favourites down to 13. We will choose the ones we will use once editing.
We played with final cut express to work out how to import these fonts and also played around with them once they were on there to see which ones looked best.
Grace edited and uploaded all of our practice filming.
We had a small passing discussion on the positioning of the text and feel that it would look good in one of the bottom corners so as not to be obstructive to the action. However, this will not be fully decided until we are at the editing stage.

Woods - practice filming

This clip shows the practice filming we did in the woods. We have decided that we need more light to show up the person. This will be in the part where she is running towards the light through the trees but we need light from behind so that she shows up and so does the pathway she is running through.

The biggest problem is getting a large enough light source into the woods.
To do this we will use the quadbikes lights and also an industrial light on a portable generator. These will be strategically placed to make the character visible while leaving appropriate shadow.